🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.